Help
This post has been edited by bmxmom23: 17 May 2011 - 10:00 AM
NBL + ABA = USA BMX Combining both sanctions under one Sanction
#1
- Rookie
- Group: Members
- Posts: 23
- Joined: 12-May 11
- LocationCalifornia
Posted 17 May 2011 - 09:59 AM
Merging...in a sense... Will benefit the riders...'TIS AS IT SHOULD BE =}
#2
- A Pro
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1,408
- Joined: 08-September 09
- LocationIsla Vista, CA somewhere near Santa Barbara
Posted 17 May 2011 - 10:02 AM
If it's good for BMX then it's good for ALL of us that race BMX 
henry
henry
#3
- Novie
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 76
- Joined: 06-September 09
- Locationsomewhere between heaven and hell
Posted 17 May 2011 - 10:02 AM
bmxmom23, on 17 May 2011 - 09:59 AM, said:
Merging...in a sense... Will benefit the riders...'TIS AS IT SHOULD BE =}
somehow i only see the NBL riders gaining the ABA was running just fine without USABMX or the NBL
#4
- Newbie
- Group: Members
- Posts: 19
- Joined: 05-September 09
- LocationReno, NV
Posted 17 May 2011 - 10:04 AM
One license good for all tracks. I'd think of that as a gain.
Honey badger don't care.
#5
- Novie
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 97
- Joined: 08-September 09
Posted 17 May 2011 - 10:10 AM
wagonguy, on 17 May 2011 - 10:04 AM, said:
One license good for all tracks. I'd think of that as a gain.
How is that a gain for any ABA tracks where there isn't an NBL track within a 1,000 miles?
#6
- Novie
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 55
- Joined: 23-March 10
Posted 17 May 2011 - 10:21 AM
bikemonkeys, on 17 May 2011 - 10:10 AM, said:
How is that a gain for any ABA tracks where there isn't an NBL track within a 1,000 miles?
It means I can race all I want at Lonestar for $10 a month!!!
(I wish)
#7
- Newbie
- Group: Members
- Posts: 19
- Joined: 05-September 09
- LocationReno, NV
Posted 17 May 2011 - 10:27 AM
bikemonkeys, on 17 May 2011 - 10:10 AM, said:
How is that a gain for any ABA tracks where there isn't an NBL track within a 1,000 miles?
How is it a loss?
I wasn't speaking of tracks, I was thinking more about riders. If you happen to be visiting somewhere and want to bring a bike, you don't have to worry about what sanction it is.
Honey badger don't care.
#8
- Newbie
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 830
- Joined: 05-September 09
Posted 17 May 2011 - 10:38 AM
Seems like a good start... A step in the right direction for sure.. I guess there will be another webinar tonight..
Brian
Brian
Just another broke off keyboard jockey..
#9
- Novie
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 97
- Joined: 08-September 09
Posted 17 May 2011 - 10:53 AM
wagonguy, on 17 May 2011 - 10:27 AM, said:
How is it a loss?
I wasn't speaking of tracks, I was thinking more about riders. If you happen to be visiting somewhere and want to bring a bike, you don't have to worry about what sanction it is.
I wasn't speaking of tracks, I was thinking more about riders. If you happen to be visiting somewhere and want to bring a bike, you don't have to worry about what sanction it is.
It'll be good. And life will go on as we know it.
#10
- A Pro
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1,408
- Joined: 08-September 09
- LocationIsla Vista, CA somewhere near Santa Barbara
Posted 17 May 2011 - 10:58 AM
Remember folks, it ain't about what 3 letters of the alphabet run a track, the most important 3 letters are B-M-X. It seems like a good move for now, maybe we can all move past the shenanigans of past & I don't just mean on here, I mean @ the administrative level (sanctions). My brotherly advice to all is to keep an eye on this, make sure it benefits the RACERS henry
henry
